Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.

Ohio Supreme Court

Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.

709 N.E.2d 1211, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1526

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 17, 1999

Docket99-342

StatusPublished

This text of 709 N.E.2d 1211 (Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holcomb v. State Farm Ins. Cos., 709 N.E.2d 1211, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1526 (Ohio 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin App. No. 98AP-353. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby allows the appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case Nos. 99-348 and 99-618, Holcomb et al. v. State Farm Ins. Cos.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall combine the briefing of case Nos. 99-342, 99-348, and 99-618 and follow the provisions of S.Ct.Prae.R. VI(4). Martin Holcomb et al., appellants in [1483]*1483case No. 99-342, shall proceed as appellants/eross-appellees and State Farm Insurance Companies, appellant in case No. 99-348, shall proceed as appellee/cross-appellant. The parties shall file one brief for each brief permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(4); the parties shall file an original of the brief in each case and eighteen copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

Moyek, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin App. No. 98AP-353. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby allows the appeal.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that the Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that this cause be consolidated with Supreme Court case Nos. 99-348 and 99-618, Holcomb et al. v. State Farm Ins. Cos.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall combine the briefing of case Nos. 99-342, 99-348, and 99-618 and follow the provisions of S.Ct.Prae.R. VI(4). Martin Holcomb et al., appellants in [1483]*1483case No. 99-342, shall proceed as appellants/eross-appellees and State Farm Insurance Companies, appellant in case No. 99-348, shall proceed as appellee/cross-appellant. The parties shall file one brief for each brief permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI(4); the parties shall file an original of the brief in each case and eighteen copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.

Moyek, C.J., Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., dissent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

709 N.E.2d 1211, 85 Ohio St. 3d 1482, 1999 Ohio LEXIS 1526, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcomb-v-state-farm-ins-cos-ohio-1999.