Holcomb v. Smith
This text of 165 S.E. 581 (Holcomb v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
I. It is the opinion of the majority of this court that the instant case comes within the ruling of the majority of the court in Smith v. Board of Trustees, 173 Ga. 437 (160 S. E. 395).
2. In consequence of the ruling in the preceding headnote, the. court erred in the issuance of a mandamus absolute requiring the payment to the petitioner of the sum of $87 per month for certain months which had already elapsed and the further sum of $87 per month as long as the petitioner may live.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
165 S.E. 581, 175 Ga. 566, 1932 Ga. LEXIS 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcomb-v-smith-ga-1932.