Holcomb v. Hamilton

1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 67, 1 Cole. Cas. 61
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1799
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 67 (Holcomb v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holcomb v. Hamilton, 1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 67, 1 Cole. Cas. 61 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case cited from Durnford & East is in point. Courts have of late, so long as the record is before thém, adopted the practice of granting all amendments to which the party would have been entitled as of course, provided that it be of no prejudice to the other party.

[68]*68^et the rule be made aboslute on payment of the costs of this motion and of the .writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Cole. & Cai. Cas. 67, 1 Cole. Cas. 61, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcomb-v-hamilton-nysupct-1799.