Holcomb v. Copeland
118 S.W.2d 932, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 54
Opinion
Plaintiffs in error having filed no briefs upon this writ of error, the same is dis *933 missed for want of prosecution. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holcomb v. Copeland, 118 S.W.2d 932, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 54 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).
118 S.W.2d 932 (Holcomb v. Copeland) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Dixieland Petroleum Corp. v. Brown
216 S.W.2d 235 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1948)