Holcomb v. Colonial Associates, L.L.C.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Holcomb v. Colonial Associates, L.L.C.

594 S.E.2d 26, 358 N.C. 148, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 181

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedFebruary 5, 2004

DocketNO. 581A02

StatusPublished

This text of 594 S.E.2d 26 (Holcomb v. Colonial Associates, L.L.C.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holcomb v. Colonial Associates, L.L.C., 594 S.E.2d 26, 358 N.C. 148, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 181 (S.C. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

The Court ex mero motu vacates its Order entered 21 August 2003 denying plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari as to additional issues and hereby allows plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari as to the additional issue of the validity of the premises liability principles of negligence upon which plaintiff prevailed at trial. Accordingly, it is ordered that the parties shall file with this Court briefs as to this issue. The appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file its brief, and appellee shall have thirty (30) days thereafter to file its responsive brief. Pursuant to North Carolina Rule of Appellate Procedure 30(f), no further oral argument will be held in this case.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 5th day of February, 2004.

Brady, J.

For the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

The Court ex mero motu vacates its Order entered 21 August 2003 denying plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari as to additional issues and hereby allows plaintiff’s petition for writ of certiorari as to the additional issue of the validity of the premises liability principles of negligence upon which plaintiff prevailed at trial. Accordingly, it is ordered that the parties shall file with this Court briefs as to this issue. The appellant shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file its brief, and appellee shall have thirty (30) days thereafter to file its responsive brief. Pursuant to North Carolina Rule of Appellate Procedure 30(f), no further oral argument will be held in this case.

By order of the Court in Conference, this 5th day of February, 2004.

Brady, J.

For the Court

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

594 S.E.2d 26, 358 N.C. 148, 2004 N.C. LEXIS 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holcomb-v-colonial-associates-llc-sc-2004.