Holbruck v. State

302 S.W.3d 818, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2010 WL 519764
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 16, 2010·No. No. WD 69975·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Nicholas Holbruck appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. On November 25, 2003, Hol-bruck entered a guilty plea to one count of the class D felony of passing bad checks under § 570.120, RSMo. Holbruck alleges that his plea counsel provided ineffective assistance by advising him that if he did not plead guilty, he would be sent to a mental health facility for an indefinite period of time. Holbruck alleges that he relied upon this statement in choosing to plead guilty, and would have insisted on going to trial but for his counsel’s misad-vice. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holbruck v. State, 302 S.W.3d 818, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 145, 2010 WL 519764 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

302 S.W.3d 818 (Holbruck v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.