Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Holbrook v. State

Holbrook v. State

244 S.E.2d 150, 144 Ga. App. 859, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 26, 1978
Docket54872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 244 S.E.2d 150 (Holbrook v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holbrook v. State, 244 S.E.2d 150, 144 Ga. App. 859, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for forgery. Held:

1. The eight enumerations of error with regard to the trial judge’s instructions to the jury are without merit. The charges in question are taken almost verbatim from the criminal pattern jury instructions and have previously been upheld against similar attack in Hardin v. State, 141 Ga. App. 115 (232 SE2d 631); Porter v. State, 141 Ga. App. 602 (234 SE2d 100); Printup v. State, 142 Ga. App. 42 (234 SE2d 840).

2. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
477 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
244 S.E.2d 150, 144 Ga. App. 859, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbrook-v-state-gactapp-1978.