Holbrook v. State

244 S.E.2d 150, 144 Ga. App. 859, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 26, 1978·No. 54872·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Quillian, Presiding Judge.

The defendant appeals his conviction for forgery. Held:

1. The eight enumerations of error with regard to the trial judge’s instructions to the jury are without merit. The charges in question are taken almost verbatim from the criminal pattern jury instructions and have previously been upheld against similar attack in Hardin v. State, 141 Ga. App. 115 (232 SE2d 631); Porter v. State, 141 Ga. App. 602 (234 SE2d 100); Printup v. State, 142 Ga. App. 42 (234 SE2d 840).

2. The evidence was sufficient to sustain the verdict.

Judgment affirmed.

Shulman and Banke, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holbrook v. State, 244 S.E.2d 150, 144 Ga. App. 859, 1978 Ga. App. LEXIS 1823 (Ga. Ct. App. 1978).

244 S.E.2d 150 (Holbrook v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fieldcrest Cannon, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
477 S.E.2d 59 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1996)