Holbrook v. Judd
This text of 1 Root 456 (Holbrook v. Judd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment —■ That the declaration is sufficient, it contains ■substantially a good consideration; that is, forbearance and stopping said suits by attachment: a clear and certain promise, [458]*458viz. that said HaLlet’s note should uot be put in suit until the then next winter; and a breach by putting it in suit on the 1st of July after; all the rest being surplusage might better haye been omitted, and may well be rejected.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Root 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbrook-v-judd-conn-1792.