Holbrook v. . Holbrook

130 N.E. 909, 230 N.Y. 600, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 879
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 1, 1921·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the negative; no opinion.

Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Cardozo, Pound and McLaughlin, JJ. Dissenting: Hogan, Crane and Andrews, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holbrook v. . Holbrook, 130 N.E. 909, 230 N.Y. 600, 1921 N.Y. LEXIS 879 (N.Y. 1921).

130 N.E. 909 (Holbrook v. . Holbrook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bailey v. Warren
319 S.W.3d 185 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2010)
In re the Probate of the Will of Radt
6 Misc. 2d 716 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1957)
In re the Probate of the Will of Meng
201 Misc. 589 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1952)
In re the Estate of Donaldson
165 Misc. 661 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1938)
In re the Estate of Land
160 Misc. 780 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)
In re the Estate of Dooling
158 Misc. 333 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1936)
In re the Estate of Callister
147 Misc. 257 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1933)
In re the Estate of Mitchell
144 Misc. 262 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1932)
In re the Re-Probate of the Last Will & Testament of Jones
134 Misc. 26 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1929)
In re Mulqueen
213 A.D. 637 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1925)
In re the Estate of Mulqueen
124 Misc. 705 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1925)