Holbrook v. Hodgson Cotton Co.

50 S.E. 916, 122 Ga. 814, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 338
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 11, 1905·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Lumpkin, J.

Where guano was sold to a married man, and subsequently the vendors brought suit against his wife, claiming that they had ascertained that she was the principal of her husband, that he bought the guano as her agent for use upon her land, and that she was liable as a .concealed principal; and where the question was one of fact and the evidence was conflicting, but there was enough on which to base a finding in favor of the plaintiffs, and the verdict was approved by the presiding judge, this court will allow it to stand. Akers v. Kirke, 91 Ga. 590; Miller v. Watt, 70 Ga. 385.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Candler, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holbrook v. Hodgson Cotton Co., 50 S.E. 916, 122 Ga. 814, 1905 Ga. LEXIS 338 (Ga. 1905).

50 S.E. 916 (Holbrook v. Hodgson Cotton Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hedden v. Hilton
225 S.E.2d 39 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1976)