Holbrook v. City of East Orange

108 A. 925, 93 N.J.L. 465, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 180
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 17, 1919
StatusPublished

This text of 108 A. 925 (Holbrook v. City of East Orange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holbrook v. City of East Orange, 108 A. 925, 93 N.J.L. 465, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1919).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

[466]*466For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 A. 925, 93 N.J.L. 465, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbrook-v-city-of-east-orange-nj-1919.