Holbrook v. City of East Orange
108 A. 925, 93 N.J.L. 465, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 180
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.
[466]*466For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenci-iard, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Heppeni-ieimer, Taylor, Gardner, Ackerson, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holbrook v. City of East Orange, 108 A. 925, 93 N.J.L. 465, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 180 (N.J. 1919).
108 A. 925 (Holbrook v. City of East Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.