Holbrook v. Brennan

New York Court of Common Pleas

Holbrook v. Brennan

48 How. Pr. 192, 1874 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 156

DecidedDecember 31, 1874

StatusPublished

This text of 48 How. Pr. 192 (Holbrook v. Brennan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holbrook v. Brennan, 48 How. Pr. 192, 1874 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 156 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1874).

Pincite

Opinion

A motion herein founded on affidavit of Charles H. Smith, Jr., and order to show cause why an order should not be made adjudging irregular and void the respondent’s notice of exception to the surety, and form of undertaking given pursuant to sections 354 and 356 of the Code, by the appellant herein on appeal to this court from the judgment rendered at the general term of the marine court of the city of New York, upon the grounds that the same is contrary to the practice of this court and is not sustained by the provisions of the Code, and to stay all proceedings upon and pursuant to such notice.

After hearing Charles H. Smith, Jr., for appellant, in support of the motion, who cited Code, sections 354 and 356, McAdam’s Pr., 277, and H. W. Bookstaver, for respondent, in opposition, who cited Laws of'1872, chapter 629, and Laws of 1874, chapter 545, it is ordered that the motion be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A motion herein founded on affidavit of Charles H. Smith, Jr., and order to show cause why an order should not be made adjudging irregular and void the respondent’s notice of exception to the surety, and form of undertaking given pursuant to sections 354 and 356 of the Code, by the appellant herein on appeal to this court from the judgment rendered at the general term of the marine court of the city of New York, upon the grounds that the same is contrary to the practice of this court and is not sustained by the provisions of the Code, and to stay all proceedings upon and pursuant to such notice.

After hearing Charles H. Smith, Jr., for appellant, in support of the motion, who cited Code, sections 354 and 356, McAdam’s Pr., 277, and H. W. Bookstaver, for respondent, in opposition, who cited Laws of'1872, chapter 629, and Laws of 1874, chapter 545, it is ordered that the motion be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 How. Pr. 192, 1874 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbrook-v-brennan-nyctcompl-1874.