Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States

174 F. 736, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5964
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided November 13, 1909·No. Nos. 5,417-5,422·Published

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

The question of fact in this case is simply and solely whether or not the olive oils covered by the invoices herein are fit or suitable for manufacturing or mechanical purposes and for no other (paragraph 626 of Free List, Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 2, 30 Stat. 199 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1685]), as contended by the importers. The Board, upon conflicting testimony, has found that .they were all edible oils (paragraph 40, same act). I do not think that the testimony so plainly points in the opposite direction that I am at liberty to decide the question of fact the other way, even if I felt like doing so; and after reading the testimony of Dr. Sharpies and Dr. Fuller, witnesses for the importers, I am unwilling to say that I should do so if I could.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States, 174 F. 736, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5964 (circtsdny 1909).

174 F. 736 (Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.