Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States

174 F. 736, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5964

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedNovember 13, 1909

DocketNos. 5,417-5,422

StatusPublished

This text of 174 F. 736 (Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holbrook Mfg. Co. v. United States, 174 F. 736, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5964 (circtsdny 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

PLATT, District Judge.

The question of fact in this case is simply and solely whether or not the olive oils covered by the invoices herein are fit or suitable for manufacturing or mechanical purposes and for no other (paragraph 626 of Free List, Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 2, 30 Stat. 199 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1685]), as contended by the importers. The Board, upon conflicting testimony, has found that .they were all edible oils (paragraph 40, same act). I do not think that the testimony so plainly points in the opposite direction that I am at liberty to decide the question of fact the other way, even if I felt like doing so; and after reading the testimony of Dr. Sharpies and Dr. Fuller, witnesses for the importers, I am unwilling to say that I should do so if I could.

Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PLATT, District Judge.

The question of fact in this case is simply and solely whether or not the olive oils covered by the invoices herein are fit or suitable for manufacturing or mechanical purposes and for no other (paragraph 626 of Free List, Act July 24, 1897, c. 11, § 2, 30 Stat. 199 [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 1685]), as contended by the importers. The Board, upon conflicting testimony, has found that .they were all edible oils (paragraph 40, same act). I do not think that the testimony so plainly points in the opposite direction that I am at liberty to decide the question of fact the other way, even if I felt like doing so; and after reading the testimony of Dr. Sharpies and Dr. Fuller, witnesses for the importers, I am unwilling to say that I should do so if I could.

Decision affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

174 F. 736, 1909 U.S. App. LEXIS 5964, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbrook-mfg-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1909.