Holbert v. Cummings
222 A.D. 665
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1927
StatusPublished
This text of 222 A.D. 665 (Holbert v. Cummings) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holbert v. Cummings, 222 A.D. 665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the defense is insufficient in law upon the face thereof viewed either as a defense or as a counterclaim. (Marsh v. Woodworth, 180 App. Div. 604.) Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Marsh v. Woodworth
180 A.D. 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
222 A.D. 665, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holbert-v-cummings-nyappdiv-1927.