Holbert v. Cummings
222 A.D. 665
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1927·Published
Opinion
Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, on the ground that the defense is insufficient in law upon the face thereof viewed either as a defense or as a counterclaim. (Marsh v. Woodworth, 180 App. Div. 604.) Present — Dowling, P. J., Finch, McAvoy, Martin and Proskauer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holbert v. Cummings, 222 A.D. 665 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
222 A.D. 665 (Holbert v. Cummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Marsh v. Woodworth
180 A.D. 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)