Holbert v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford

14 F.R.D. 148, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4568
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania·Decided April 15, 1953·No. Civ. A. Nos. 4515, 4514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WATSON, Chief Judge.

The defendant in each case has moved that the trial in that case be held jointly with the trial in the other case. In each case the plaintiff has filed an answer to the motion.

After carefully studying the pleadings and the terms of the insurance policy in each case, I have reached the conclusion that as the trials are to be jury trials and the provisions as to permanent and total disability are not the same in each policy, the motions for a joint trial of the cases should be denied, and, therefore, said motions are hereby denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holbert v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford, 14 F.R.D. 148, 1953 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4568 (M.D. Pa. 1953).

14 F.R.D. 148 (Holbert v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. of Hartford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Arroyo v. Chardon
90 F.R.D. 603 (D. Puerto Rico, 1981)