Holahan v. Holahan

274 A.D. 846, 81 N.Y.S.2d 923
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided July 8, 1948·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Love and Kimball, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the ground that there was a merger of the separation agreement in the decree of divorce notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph V of the separation agreement. (The judgment is for plaintiff in an action to recover balance due under a separation agreement. The order grants plaintiff’s motion to strike out defendant’s answer and amended answer and directs summary judgment for plaintiff.) Present — Taylor, P. J., McCurn, Love, Vaughan and Kimball, JJ. [191 Misc. 47.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holahan v. Holahan, 274 A.D. 846, 81 N.Y.S.2d 923 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

274 A.D. 846 (Holahan v. Holahan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Merl v. Merl
110 A.D.2d 887 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)
Jewett v. Jewett
79 Misc. 2d 76 (New York County Courts, 1974)
Skolnik v. Skolnik
75 Misc. 2d 805 (New York Supreme Court, 1973)
McMains v. McMains
206 N.E.2d 185 (New York Court of Appeals, 1965)
Howland v. Howland
15 A.D.2d 122 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)
Murray v. Murray
278 A.D. 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
King v. King
201 Misc. 91 (New York Supreme Court, 1951)