Holabert v. Blakely
This text of 1 Root 505 (Holabert v. Blakely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The reply is no answer to the plea, because it doth not traverse the time of doing the facts, alleged in the plea.
All a man’s personal estate, with certain exceptions, is liable for the payment of his taxes — and by the statute all his real estate which he is seized and possessed of: in fee, is made liable to the payment of his taxes; of consequence all other estate which may partake of the nature of both real and personal is liable: Whenever it becomes necessary to take property from the debtor to satisfy his just debts, so much, must be taken, as is necessary to satisfy the demand; but it ought to be taken in such a manner, as will be least prejudicial and distressing to [507]*507the debtor: To take the whole of the plaintiff’s interest for three years, was not necessary, and must be very distressing to him; whereas to hare taken the whole of his estate in a part, would equally hare answered the demand, and left him the means of subsisting. And this is analogous to the] proceedings upon an elegit in Great Britain, where the debt is leried and satisfied from one-lialf of the profits of the land, etc.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Root 505, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holabert-v-blakely-conn-1793.