Hoko River Boom Co. v. Fairservice
133 P. 1037, 74 Wash. 698, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2120
This text of 133 P. 1037 (Hoko River Boom Co. v. Fairservice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoko River Boom Co. v. Fairservice, 133 P. 1037, 74 Wash. 698, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2120 (Wash. 1913).
Opinion
On Reheabing.
— The court has considered this case upon rehearing and the majority of the court adhere to the opinion as reported in 69 Wash. 357, 125 Pac. 145, and for the reasons there given, the judgment should be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Allard Cattle Co. v. COLORADO & SOUTHERN RAILWAY CO.
516 P.2d 123 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 1973)
Union Pacific Railroad v. Snow
231 U.S. 204 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
133 P. 1037, 74 Wash. 698, 1913 Wash. LEXIS 2120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoko-river-boom-co-v-fairservice-wash-1913.