Hoke v. . Carter

34 N.C. 327
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedAugust 5, 1851
StatusPublished

This text of 34 N.C. 327 (Hoke v. . Carter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoke v. . Carter, 34 N.C. 327 (N.C. 1851).

Opinion

We cannot entertain the appeal. The defendants do not except to the judgment. It is just what they asked for — they are not "dissatisfied therewith." How can they appeal?

It is only when both parties except to the judgment as erroneous that both have a ground for appeal, as in the case of Devereux v. Burgwin,33 N.C. 490. The defendant excepted because of error in not giving judgment in his favor, and the plaintiff excepted because of error in that he was not allowed interest upon the $1,000 for which he had judgment.

The appeal must be dismissed and the defendants will pay the costs of appeal.

PER CURIAM. Appeal dismissed. *Page 226

(328)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Devereux v. . Burgwin
33 N.C. 490 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1850)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 N.C. 327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoke-v-carter-nc-1851.