Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc.
195 A.D. 893
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1921·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order modified by striking out the provision allowing defendant to file an amended answer, and as so modified affirmed without costs, on the ground that the notice of motion contained no request for such relief, and no proposed amended answer was attached to the motion papers. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc., 195 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
195 A.D. 893 (Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Möllerson v. City of New York
178 Misc. 2d 803 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Walsam Fifth Avenue Development Co. v. Lions Gate Capital Corp.
163 Misc. 2d 1071 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1995)
Goldner Trucking Corp. v. Stoll Packing Corp.
12 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)