Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc.

Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc.

195 A.D. 893
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 15, 1921
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 195 A.D. 893 (Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoisting Machinery Co. v. Elderfields Reservation, Inc., 195 A.D. 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision allowing defendant to file an amended answer, and as so modified affirmed without costs, on the ground that the notice of motion contained no request for such relief, and no proposed amended answer was attached to the motion papers. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Greenbaum, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Möllerson v. City of New York
178 Misc. 2d 803 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
Walsam Fifth Avenue Development Co. v. Lions Gate Capital Corp.
163 Misc. 2d 1071 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 1995)
Goldner Trucking Corp. v. Stoll Packing Corp.
12 A.D.2d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1960)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 A.D. 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoisting-machinery-co-v-elderfields-reservation-inc-nyappdiv-1921.