Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin

Supreme Court of Florida

Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin

181 So. 2d 633, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2806

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedNovember 17, 1965

DocketNo. 33609

StatusPublished

This text of 181 So. 2d 633 (Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin, 181 So. 2d 633, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2806 (Fla. 1965).

Pincite

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

Upon further consideration of this cause, the Court fails to find from an examination of the written record of the proceedings of the trial court conflict of decisions within the purview of Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. sufficient to vest in this Court jurisdiction in this cause. It is thereupon, for the reasons stated above,

Ordered that the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause be and the same is hereby discharged.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and THOMAS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

ERVIN, J., dissents with Opinion.

ROBERTS, J., dissents and concurs with ERVIN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI