Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin
181 So. 2d 633, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2806
Opinions
Upon further consideration of this cause, the Court fails to find from an examination of the written record of the proceedings of the trial court conflict of decisions within the purview of Article V of the Florida Constitution, F.S.A. sufficient to vest in this Court jurisdiction in this cause. It is thereupon, for the reasons stated above,
Ordered that the writ of certiorari heretofore issued in this cause be and the same is hereby discharged.
It is so ordered.
ERVIN, J., dissents with Opinion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin, 181 So. 2d 633, 1965 Fla. LEXIS 2806 (Fla. 1965).
181 So. 2d 633 (Hoisington ex rel. Hoisington v. Kulchin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Welch v. Moothart
89 So. 2d 485 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)
Hoisington v. Kulchin
178 So. 2d 349 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Nielsen v. City of Sarasota
117 So. 2d 731 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1960)
Loftin v. Bryan
63 So. 2d 310 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1953)
Webster v. Kemp
164 So. 2d 814 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Carraway v. Revell
116 So. 2d 16 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1959)
Cormier v. Williams
4 So. 2d 525 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
R. L. Bernardo & Sons, Inc. v. Duncan
145 So. 2d 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1962)
Hoisington v. Kulchin
172 So. 2d 586 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1965)