Hoimes v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.

294 A.D.2d 332, 741 N.Y.S.2d 727, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4844

This text of 294 A.D.2d 332 (Hoimes v. Home Depot, USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hoimes v. Home Depot, USA, Inc., 294 A.D.2d 332, 741 N.Y.S.2d 727, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4844 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme [333]*333Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.), dated February 6, 2001, as denied its cross motion, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (7) to dismiss the punitive damages claims in the amended complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Contrary to the appellant’s contention, the plaintiff adequately pleaded an “underlying cause of action upon which a demand for punitive damages can be granted” (Rocanova v Equitable, 83 NY2d 603, 616).

The appellant’s remaining contentions are either raised for the first time on appeal or without merit. Florio, J.P., Smith, Townes and Crane, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States
634 N.E.2d 940 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
294 A.D.2d 332, 741 N.Y.S.2d 727, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4844, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoimes-v-home-depot-usa-inc-nyappdiv-2002.