Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.
76 F. 472, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2891
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided September 24, 1896·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Complainant, having been defeated upon the accounting, should pay the master’s fees. The result of the litigation shows that he has needlessly harassed defendant, and it would be inequitable to require defendant to pay the expenses of defending himself against an improper claim. There being nothing to contradict the master’s affidavit, nor anything tending to show that his- charge is unreasonable, it is fixed at $550. Complainant having already paid $200, an order may be taken requiring him to pay the additional $850;
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co., 76 F. 472, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2891 (circtsdny 1896).
76 F. 472 (Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gold Seal Importers, Inc. v. Morris White Fashions, Inc.
4 F.R.D. 386 (S.D. New York, 1945)
Salvage Process Corp. v. Acme Tank Cleaning Process Corp.
104 F.2d 105 (Second Circuit, 1939)