Hohn v. United States

Supreme Court

Hohn v. United States

522 U.S. 944, 118 S. Ct. 361

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 31, 1997

DocketNo. 96-8986

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 522 U.S. 944 (Hohn v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hohn v. United States, 522 U.S. 944, 118 S. Ct. 361 (1997).

Pincite

Opinion

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “In light of the fact that the Court of Appeals denied the petitioner’s request [945]*945for a certificate of appealability, does this Court have jurisdiction to grant certiorari, vacate, and remand this ease per the suggestion of the Acting Solicitor General?” Jeffrey S. Sutton, Esq., of Columbus, Ohio, a member of the Bar of this Court, is invited to brief and argue this ease as amicus cmiae against this Court's jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

C. A. 8th Cir. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed informa pauperis granted. Certiorari granted limited to the following question: “In light of the fact that the Court of Appeals denied the petitioner’s request [945]*945for a certificate of appealability, does this Court have jurisdiction to grant certiorari, vacate, and remand this ease per the suggestion of the Acting Solicitor General?” Jeffrey S. Sutton, Esq., of Columbus, Ohio, a member of the Bar of this Court, is invited to brief and argue this ease as amicus cmiae against this Court's jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

522 U.S. 944, 118 S. Ct. 361, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hohn-v-united-states-scotus-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack