Hohmann v. Corkran

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Hohmann v. Corkran

140 A. 920, 102 N.J. Eq. 333, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 601

DecidedFebruary 6, 1928

StatusPublished

This text of 140 A. 920 (Hohmann v. Corkran) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hohmann v. Corkran, 140 A. 920, 102 N.J. Eq. 333, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 601 (N.J. 1928).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cubiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 234.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiek, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetcellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 234.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cubiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 234.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Katzenbach, Campbell, Lloyd, White, Yan Buskiek, MoGlennon, Kays, Hetcellor Berry, and reported in 100 N. J. Eq. 234.

For reversal — None.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 A. 920, 102 N.J. Eq. 333, 1928 N.J. LEXIS 601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hohmann-v-corkran-nj-1928.