Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co.

Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co.

191 N.E. 1, 128 Ohio St. 257, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 257, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 332
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedApril 11, 1934
Docket24425
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 191 N.E. 1 (Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co., 191 N.E. 1, 128 Ohio St. 257, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 257, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 332 (Ohio 1934).

Opinion

It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that neither Sections 3957 and 3958, General Code, nor Sections 41 and 1415 of the Code of 1919 of the city of Toledo, Ohio, create nor authorize the creation of a lien upon real property for charges for water supplied by such city to the premises of defendant in error.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Musca v. Village of Chagrin Falls
444 N.E.2d 475 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1981)
Pfau v. City of Cincinnati
50 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)
Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Tyson
12 N.E.2d 478 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1938)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 N.E. 1, 128 Ohio St. 257, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 257, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hohly-v-state-ex-rel-summit-superior-co-ohio-1934.