Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co.
191 N.E. 1, 128 Ohio St. 257, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 257, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 332
Opinion
It is ordered and adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said Court of Appeals be, and the same is hereby, affirmed for the reason that neither Sections 3957 and 3958, General Code, nor Sections 41 and 1415 of the Code of 1919 of the city of Toledo, Ohio, create nor authorize the creation of a lien upon real property for charges for water supplied by such city to the premises of defendant in error.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co., 191 N.E. 1, 128 Ohio St. 257, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 257, 1934 Ohio LEXIS 332 (Ohio 1934).
191 N.E. 1 (Hohly v. State Ex Rel. Summit Superior Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Musca v. Village of Chagrin Falls
444 N.E.2d 475 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1981)
Pfau v. City of Cincinnati
50 N.E.2d 172 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1943)
Home Owners' Loan Corp. v. Tyson
12 N.E.2d 478 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1938)