Hohl v. Joyner

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hohl v. Joyner

235 A.D. 855

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 855 (Hohl v. Joyner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hohl v. Joyner, 235 A.D. 855 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten doEars costs, on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice wiE not be promoted by changing the place of trial from Dutchess county, where the plaintiff and his witnesses reside, to Lewis county, where neither of the parties and but four of the witnesses reside. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, CarsweE and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order reversed on the law and the facts, with ten doEars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten doEars costs, on the ground that the convenience of witnesses and the ends of justice wiE not be promoted by changing the place of trial from Dutchess county, where the plaintiff and his witnesses reside, to Lewis county, where neither of the parties and but four of the witnesses reside. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, CarsweE and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 855, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hohl-v-joyner-nyappdiv-1932.