Hogue v. Cottle

General Court of Virginia

Hogue v. Cottle

2 Va. 229

DecidedNovember 15, 1820

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Va. 229 (Hogue v. Cottle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hogue v. Cottle, 2 Va. 229 (Va. Super. Ct. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

The following judgment was entered :

“The Court is unanimously of opinion, and doth decide, 1. That the Plaintiffs in this Case may recover a judgment by motion, although the motion was not made at the next succeeding Court after the return day of the execution. 2. That the Plaintiff may recover by motion against the Sheriff, and his securities, for the failure of the Deputy of the said Sheriff to pay money levied on execution by him.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The following judgment was entered :

“The Court is unanimously of opinion, and doth decide, 1. That the Plaintiffs in this Case may recover a judgment by motion, although the motion was not made at the next succeeding Court after the return day of the execution. 2. That the Plaintiff may recover by motion against the Sheriff, and his securities, for the failure of the Deputy of the said Sheriff to pay money levied on execution by him.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Va. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogue-v-cottle-vagensess-1820.