Hogs Back Consolidated Mining Co. v. New Basil Consolidated Mining Co.

63 Cal. 121, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 378
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedFebruary 8, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 63 Cal. 121 (Hogs Back Consolidated Mining Co. v. New Basil Consolidated Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogs Back Consolidated Mining Co. v. New Basil Consolidated Mining Co., 63 Cal. 121, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 378 (Cal. 1883).

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

In this case plaintiff had judgment against defendant by default; the court below denied a motion to open the default, and defendant appealed.

The following is the affidavit of service of the amended complaint: —

“D. W. Spear of said Placer County, being duly sworn, says: That he is a citizen of the United States, and is, and was on the 20th day of October, 1881, over eighteen years of age, and not a party to this action. That on the 20th day of October, 1881, the amended complaint in the said action was filed; that forthwith, to wit, on the 20th day of October, 1881, he, affiant, deposited in the postoffice at Auburn, Placer County, California, a copy of the said amended complaint, enclosed in a sealed envelope, postage - prepaid, and directed to Edward Lynch (the attorney for defendant herein), at No. 324 Pine Street, San [122]*122Francisco, California, the place where said attorney resides and has his office.”

The affidavit of service was insufficient, and therefore the default in the case was improperly entered. (Reed v. Allison, 61 Cal. 461; Cunningham v. Warnekey, 61 Cal. 507; Moore v. Besse, 35 Cal. 185; People v. Alameda T. R. Co. 30 Cal. 182; § 1012, Code Civ. Proc.)

Judgment reversed, and cause remanded with leave to apellant to file an answer to the complaint within twenty days after the filing of the remittitur herein in the court below.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West v. West
92 Cal. App. 3d 120 (California Court of Appeal, 1979)
Santana v. Salinas
54 P.R. 109 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
Carlon v. Gray
52 P.2d 966 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Gascón v. Alvarez
28 P.R. 336 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1920)
Townsend v. Parker
131 P. 766 (California Court of Appeal, 1913)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Cal. 121, 1883 Cal. LEXIS 378, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogs-back-consolidated-mining-co-v-new-basil-consolidated-mining-co-cal-1883.