Hoghtaling v. Osborn
15 Johns. 119
This text of 15 Johns. 119 (Hoghtaling v. Osborn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hoghtaling v. Osborn, 15 Johns. 119 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1818).
Opinion
It was proper to receive the verdict, presuming that the jury were impannelled before Sunday commenced ; but it was illegal to enter the judgment on Sunday, and for. that cause it must be reversed.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
People ex rel. La Velle v. Traphagen
134 Misc. 604 (New York Supreme Court, 1929)
State Bank v. Spence
37 Misc. 854 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1902)
Scott Shoe Machinery Co. v. Dancel
63 A.D. 172 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1901)
Stone v. United States
167 U.S. 178 (Supreme Court, 1897)
United States v. Ball
163 U.S. 662 (Supreme Court, 1896)
Blaney v. State
21 A. 547 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1891)
State v. Fenlason
7 A. 385 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1886)
Territory v. Nichols
3 N.M. 76 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1884)
In re Worthington
30 F. Cas. 643 (W.D. Wisconsin, 1876)
Stone v. Bird
16 Kan. 488 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1876)
Johnston v. People
31 Ill. 469 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1863)
Isaacs v. Beth Hamedash Society
1 Hilt. 469 (New York Court of Common Pleas, 1857)
Webber v. Merrill
34 N.H. 202 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1856)
Pulling v. People
8 Barb. 384 (New York Supreme Court, 1850)
Davis v. Fish
1 Greene 406 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1848)
Baxter v. People
8 Ill. 368 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1846)
Maxson v. Annas
1 Denio 204 (Court for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors, 1845)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
15 Johns. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hoghtaling-v-osborn-nysupct-1818.