Hogg v. The Pennsylvania Annex

35 F. 560
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
DecidedJuly 5, 1888
DocketNo. 3
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 F. 560 (Hogg v. The Pennsylvania Annex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogg v. The Pennsylvania Annex, 35 F. 560 (circtedny 1888).

Opinion

Blatchford, Justice.

In this case I find, as a fact, that the libelant has not established by sufficient proof the allegation of the libel that the steam-boat or ferry-boat known as the “Pennsylvania Annex Boat No. 3,” on the occasion mentioned in the libel, ran into and upon the steam-ship mentioned in the libel, and then called the “Western Texas,” and caused damage and injury to her. On the foregoing fact I find, as a conclusion of law, tfiat, a decree must be entered dismissing the libel, with costs to the claimant in the district court, taxed at $401.82, and with costs to it in this court, to be taxed.

The objections of the libelant to the attempt to show by the witness Rose, on his cross-examination, statements alleged to have been made by .Rivers to Rose, and to the attempt to show by the witness Rose, on his cross-examination, that Rivers was untruthful, are sustained. All the objections of the claimant to the admission of evidence, set forth in the paper-submitted on his behalf to the court, are overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Brien Bros. v. Compania Trasatlantica
36 F.2d 825 (S.D. New York, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 F. 560, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogg-v-the-pennsylvania-annex-circtedny-1888.