Hogg v. Pinckney

15 S.C. 616, 1881 S.C. LEXIS 123
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hogg v. Pinckney. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 S.C. 387
Supreme Court of South Carolina·Decided August 1, 1881·No. No. 1069·Published

Opinion

Motion to restore to the docket an appeal dismissed by the clerk March 1st, 1881, under Hule VII., as then of force, the appellant having failed after notice requiring it, to serve upon the respondent three copies of his case as prepared for argument. But as that rule required the three copies to be served within twenty days after the return was filed, and as the return had not been filed when the notice was given, and no demand had been made under Bule II., as then of force, to have the return filed within ten days after such demand, the notice was premature, and entailed no waiver upon the appellant for non-compliance. Motion granted. Opinion by

Simpson, C. J.,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hogg v. Pinckney, 15 S.C. 616, 1881 S.C. LEXIS 123 (S.C. 1881).

15 S.C. 616 (Hogg v. Pinckney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.