Hogg v. Parker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hogg v. Parker

20 A.D.2d 611, 245 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2603

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 27, 1963·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Petitioner, charged with a traffic infraction, upon arraignment before the respondent as Justice of the Peace, demanded an immediate trial. The Justice over petitioner’s objection adjourned the case. In this article 78 proceeding addressed to the power of the Justice to grant the adjournment the Special "Term prohibited further proceedings in the Justices’ Court. The Justice had jurisdiction of the defendant and of the offense and consequently had power to adjourn the case. This is the only question determinable in this proceeding. Order reversed on the law and petition dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur. [38 Misc 2d 41.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petitioner, charged with a traffic infraction, upon arraignment before the respondent as Justice of the Peace, demanded an immediate trial. The Justice over petitioner’s objection adjourned the case. In this article 78 proceeding addressed to the power of the Justice to grant the adjournment the Special "Term prohibited further proceedings in the Justices’ Court. The Justice had jurisdiction of the defendant and of the offense and consequently had power to adjourn the case. This is the only question determinable in this proceeding. Order reversed on the law and petition dismissed, without costs. Bergan, P. J., Gibson, Herlihy, Reynolds and Taylor, JJ., concur. [38 Misc 2d 41.]

Hogg v. Parker, 20 A.D.2d 611, 245 N.Y.S.2d 406, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2603 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

20 A.D.2d 611 (Hogg v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related