Hogg v. Martin

22 S.C.L. 156
CourtCourt of Appeals of South Carolina
DecidedMay 10, 1836
StatusPublished

This text of 22 S.C.L. 156 (Hogg v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogg v. Martin, 22 S.C.L. 156 (S.C. Ct. App. 1836).

Opinion

We concur in the law of the case as ruled by the Judge below. Upon the facts we perceive no reason to be dissatisfied with the verdict of the Jury. The motion is dismissed.

JOHN B. O’NEALL, HENRY V/. BESAÜSS'ÜE'E, 3. JOHNSTON, 3. S. RICHARDSON, Wf. HARPER, A. P. BUTLEJR, B. 3- EARLE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
22 S.C.L. 156, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogg-v-martin-scctapp-1836.