Hogg v. Fraizer

5 Ky. Op. 491, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 473
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided April 12, 1871·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Peters :

This was a motion instituted by appellant against Appellee Fraizier, constable of Breathitt county, and his sureties in the Owsley quarterly court, for -neglect of official duty on the part of Fraizier in Breathitt county.

The quarterly court having rendered judgment for appellant for the amount claimed, Fraizier appealed to the circuit court, and there the motion was dismissed, from which judgment this appeal is prosecuted.

The question of jurisdiction is the only one involved in this appeal and that is settled by this court in two recent cases, after being elaborately argued and maturely considered, adversely to appellant. The first is Groom’s Administration v. Pickett, 4 Bush 372, and second, Foster, etc., v. Wade and the Commonwealth, lb. 628. It had been previously adjudicated by this court in Bank of Ky. v. Harrison, etc., 1 Bush 384, but at the solicitation of counsel the question was again considered in the cases cited and the last named decision approved.

The judgment must therefore be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hogg v. Fraizer, 5 Ky. Op. 491, 1871 Ky. LEXIS 473 (Ky. Ct. App. 1871).

5 Ky. Op. 491 (Hogg v. Fraizer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Kentucky v. Harrison
64 Ky. 384 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1866)
Groom's adm'r v. Pickett
67 Ky. 372 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1868)