Hogg v. Allen

277 A.D.2d 893

This text of 277 A.D.2d 893 (Hogg v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogg v. Allen, 277 A.D.2d 893 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for claimed violation of plaintiff’s possession of real property, order of the County Court of Westchester County, dated January 25, 1950, reversed on the law and the facts, with $10 costs and disbursements, the motion for an order dismissing the complaint in action Ho. 2, on the ground that there is another action pending between the same parties for the same relief, granted, without costs, and the motion pursuant to the notice of motion dated December 13, 1949, for an order requiring the plaintiff to serve an amended complaint in action Ho. 1, stating and numbering separately the causes of action contained in that complaint which apply to the defendant City of White Plains, granted, with $10 costs. The notice of abandonment served by the plaintiff was not effectual to discontinue the first action. Kortwellyeszsy v. Manhattan Cooperage Co. (162 App. Div. 285) does not hold to the contrary. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kortwellyeszsy v. Manhattan Cooperage Co.
162 A.D. 285 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1914)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 893, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogg-v-allen-nyappdiv-1950.