Hoge v. Deutsch

Sixth Circuit

Hoge v. Deutsch

185 F.2d 259, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3263

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedNovember 13, 1950

Docket11105

StatusPublished

This text of 185 F.2d 259 (Hoge v. Deutsch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hoge v. Deutsch, 185 F.2d 259, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 3263 (6th Cir. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause was heard upon the transcript of the record, briefs and arguments of counsel. It was heard below by the District Judge without the intervention of a jury. The Judge filed an opinion including findnigs of fact and conclusions of law. D.C. *260 94 F.Supp. 33. The findings of fact are not dearly erroneous.

It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the judgment appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed upon the grounds and for the reasons set forth in the decision of the district court, including the findings of fact and conclusions of law filed February 15, 1949.

The appellee is not entitled to additional relief by way of special damages as set out in his brief. There was no cross appeal.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI