Hogan v. Vandewater

2019 NY Slip Op 3485

Opinion

Hogan v Vandewater (2019 NY Slip Op 03485)

Hogan v Vandewater

2019 NY Slip Op 03485

Decided on May 3, 2019

Appellate Division, Fourth Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Decided on May 3, 2019 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J., CENTRA, DEJOSEPH, CURRAN, AND WINSLOW, JJ.

218 CA 18-01893

[*1]MARK HOGAN AND ELIZABETH HOGAN, INDIVIDUALLY, AND AS PARENTS AND NATURAL GUARDIANS OF JACK A. HOGAN, AN INFANT, AND ITHACA G. HOGAN, AN INFANT, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v

DAVID VANDEWATER, FRANK P. ROSE, DEFENDANTS, AND GINA NICOLETTI, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

BOSMAN LAW FIRM, LLC, ROME (A.J. BOSMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS.

BARCLAY DAMON LLP, ROCHESTER (KELSEY TILL THOMPSON OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Lewis County (James P. McClusky, J.), entered May 5, 2017. The judgment, among other things, dismissed plaintiffs' complaint against defendant Gina Nicoletti.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Same memorandum as in Hogan v Vandewater ([appeal No. 1] — AD3d — [May 3, 2019] [4th Dept 2019]).

Entered: May 3, 2019

Mark W. Bennett

Clerk of the Court