Hogan v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 29, 2010·No. Civil Action No. 2010-1093·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA fILED jUN 1. 9 101) Ricky Lamar Hogan, ) 5 District and ) Clerk, U. ·tCY courts Bankrup Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. ) United States of America et at., ) ) If lU9~ Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the Court on review of plaintiff s pro se complaint and application

to proceed in forma pauperis. The application will be granted and the complaint will be

dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A (requiring dismissal ofa prisoner's complaint upon a

determination that the complaint, among other grounds, is frivolous or fails to state a claim upon

which relief can be granted).

Plaintiff is a prisoner at the Georgia State Prison in Reidsville, Georgia. He sues

President Barack Obama, former Presidents George W. Bush, William Jefferson Clinton and

George H.W. Bush, and several United States agencies under 18 U.S.C. § 2333 for allegedly

committing terrorist acts against him. Although § 2333 provides for civil remedies for injuries

suffered "by reason of an act of international terrorism," such an action cannot be maintained

against the United States, its agencies and its officials acting within their official capacity. 18

U.S.C. § 2237(1). Plaintiff cannot credibly argue that the former presidents were acting in their

individual capacities. Hence, the complaint will be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A separate Order of dismissal accompanies this Memorandum

Opinion.

". Date: June-a,) ,2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hogan v. United States of America, (D.D.C. 2010).

Hogan v. United States of America (Hogan v. United States of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related