Hogan v. Tillman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Hogan v. Tillman

380 S.E.2d 53, 259 Ga. 88, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 115

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 15, 1989·No. 46744·Published

Opinion

Smith, Justice.

This case involves a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a superior court judge and the clerk of the superior court to act in such [89]*89a way as to not deny the applicant “his rights to due process; procedural due process rights, and equal protection of the law.” He also seeks an award of damages from the judge and clerk.

Decided March 15, 1989. Ricky Lamar Hogan, pro se. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, for appellees.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), and the petition is therefore dismissed.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Smith, Justice.

This case involves a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a superior court judge and the clerk of the superior court to act in such [89]*89a way as to not deny the applicant “his rights to due process; procedural due process rights, and equal protection of the law.” He also seeks an award of damages from the judge and clerk.

Decided March 15, 1989. Ricky Lamar Hogan, pro se. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, for appellees.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), and the petition is therefore dismissed.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Hogan v. Tillman, 380 S.E.2d 53, 259 Ga. 88, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 115 (Ga. 1989).

Pincite

380 S.E.2d 53 (Hogan v. Tillman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related