Hogan v. Tillman

380 S.E.2d 53, 259 Ga. 88, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 115
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMarch 15, 1989
Docket46744
StatusPublished

This text of 380 S.E.2d 53 (Hogan v. Tillman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogan v. Tillman, 380 S.E.2d 53, 259 Ga. 88, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 115 (Ga. 1989).

Opinion

Smith, Justice.

This case involves a petition for a writ of mandamus to compel a superior court judge and the clerk of the superior court to act in such [89]*89a way as to not deny the applicant “his rights to due process; procedural due process rights, and equal protection of the law.” He also seeks an award of damages from the judge and clerk.

Decided March 15, 1989. Ricky Lamar Hogan, pro se. Robert E. Wilson, District Attorney, for appellees.

In view of the fact that this is a direct application to this Court for a writ of mandamus, this case is controlled by Brown v. Johnson, 251 Ga. 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983), and the petition is therefore dismissed.

Petition for writ dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. Johnson
306 S.E.2d 655 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 S.E.2d 53, 259 Ga. 88, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-tillman-ga-1989.