Hogan v. Thompson

2 La. Ann. 538
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMay 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 2 La. Ann. 538 (Hogan v. Thompson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogan v. Thompson, 2 La. Ann. 538 (La. 1847).

Opinion

The judgment of the court was pronounced by

Rost, J.

The plaintiff, iu the capacity of curatrix of the vacant succession-of- Andrew Thompson, her husband, has instituted this action for the partition-of certain moveable effects, held'in common by the deceased and the defendant. The court below, upon due proof that the property could not be conveniently divided in kind, ordered a licitation for- cash. From that decree the defendant has appealed.

The grounds upon which he asks a-'reversal of the judgment, are untenable. Tho decree of- the court appointing the plaintiff curatrix, stands unreversed and unappealed from. We cannot enquire collaterally into its validity, or the correctness of the reasons which induced the decision of the judge. The' plaintiff administers the succession for the benefit of the creditors and heirs, whoever they be. If there are no debts, the heirs, if present or represented, may take possession of the succession at any time ; but until they do, it is her duty to administer it according to law; and the first aot of her administration-must be, the sale of the moveable effects belonging to the succession.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cherry's Succession v. Metropolitan Life Ins.
176 So. 645 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1937)
Soule v. West
170 So. 26 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 La. Ann. 538, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-thompson-la-1847.