Hogan v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hogan v. State

458 S.W.3d 461, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 2015 WL 1246242

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 17, 2015·No. No. ED 100757·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kerry Hogan (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasbns for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Kerry Hogan (“Movant”) appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his request for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 29.15 after an evidentiary hearing.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasbns for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Hogan v. State, 458 S.W.3d 461, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 284, 2015 WL 1246242 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

458 S.W.3d 461 (Hogan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.