Hogan v. State
219 So. 3d 1009, 2017 WL 2491625, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences except as to Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2015-CF-006417-0. As to' that - case, as the State properly concedes, Appellant cannot be convicted of fraudulent use of a credit card and petit theft. See Wolf v. State, 679 So.2d 351 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court shall vacate Appellant’s petit theft conviction in Case No. 2015-CF-006417-0.
AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED’ in part, and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hogan v. State, 219 So. 3d 1009, 2017 WL 2491625, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).
219 So. 3d 1009 (Hogan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wolf v. State
679 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)