Hogan v. State

219 So. 3d 1009, 2017 WL 2491625, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 9, 2017·No. Case No. 5D16-1301·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions and sentences except as to Orange County Circuit Court Case No. 2015-CF-006417-0. As to' that - case, as the State properly concedes, Appellant cannot be convicted of fraudulent use of a credit card and petit theft. See Wolf v. State, 679 So.2d 351 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). On remand, the trial court shall vacate Appellant’s petit theft conviction in Case No. 2015-CF-006417-0.

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED’ in part, and REMANDED.

COHEN, C.J., ORFINGER and EDWARDS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hogan v. State, 219 So. 3d 1009, 2017 WL 2491625, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 8519 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

219 So. 3d 1009 (Hogan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wolf v. State
679 So. 2d 351 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)