Hogan v. State
542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1191, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2710, 1989 WL 49607
Opinion
John Hogan appeals from a second judgment and sentence in which the trial court, upon remand for resentencing, departed from the recommended guidelines range based upon the one valid reason upheld by this court in Hogan’s previous appeal.1 Due to an intervening change in the law, as reflected in State v. Jones, 530 So.2d 53 (Fla.1988), we REVERSE and REMAND [1069] for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Hogan v. State, 542 So. 2d 1068, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1191, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 2710, 1989 WL 49607 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).
542 So. 2d 1068 (Hogan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harmon v. State
547 So. 2d 1027 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)