Hogan v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Hogan v. State

324 So. 2d 196, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19059

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Hogan v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 330 So. 2d 557 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 4, 1975·No. No. Y-172·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant; by his directions to the Clerk for preparation of the transcript, failed to have included therein a transcript of the proceedings at his arraignment and sentencing. We are, thus, unable to determine [197]*197whether or not there is merit to his contentions made in proper person and subsequently in his reply brief filed by his private attorney.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant; by his directions to the Clerk for preparation of the transcript, failed to have included therein a transcript of the proceedings at his arraignment and sentencing. We are, thus, unable to determine [197]*197whether or not there is merit to his contentions made in proper person and subsequently in his reply brief filed by his private attorney.

Affirmed.

RAWLS, Acting C. J., and McCORD and SMITH, JJ., concur.

Hogan v. State, 324 So. 2d 196, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 19059 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

324 So. 2d 196 (Hogan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.