Hogan v. Hogan
This text of 3 Ky. Op. 630 (Hogan v. Hogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court by
It being equally the duty of each partner to attend to the collection of the Herrigan debt the alleged promise by the appellee to the appellant to give him all he could make by attending to the suit for it, was gratituous and could not be enforced.
The circuit court therefore did not err in either instructing or refusing to instruct the jury.
And therefore, the credits claimed by the appellant having been conceded, the verdict was authorized by the law and the facts.
Wherefore the judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
3 Ky. Op. 630, 1868 Ky. LEXIS 279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-hogan-kyctapp-1868.