Hogan v. Goodspeed

New York Court of Appeals

Hogan v. Goodspeed

622 N.E.2d 293, 82 N.Y.2d 710

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 26, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by12 cases

This text of 622 N.E.2d 293 (Hogan v. Goodspeed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hogan v. Goodspeed, 622 N.E.2d 293, 82 N.Y.2d 710 (N.Y. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On petitioner Montgomery’s appeal, order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (196 AD2d 675).

Appeal by petitioners Hogan and Freebern dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division was not a dissent in their favor (CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On petitioner Montgomery’s appeal, order affirmed, without costs, for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (196 AD2d 675).

Appeal by petitioners Hogan and Freebern dismissed, without costs, upon the ground that the two-Justice dissent at the Appellate Division was not a dissent in their favor (CPLR 5601 [a]).

Concur: Chief Judge Kaye and Judges Simons, Titone, Hancock, Jr., Bellacosa and Smith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

622 N.E.2d 293, 82 N.Y.2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-goodspeed-ny-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack