Hogan v. Burtner

Supreme Court of Florida

Hogan v. Burtner

30 So. 2d 634, 159 Fla. 54, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 678

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 3, 1947·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Here we are asked to review on certiorari the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, affirming the judgment of the Civil Court of Record of Dade County in a replevin action. The petitioner failed to show that appellant in the trial court suffered any injury by reason of the alleged errors complained of and, therefore, has failed here to show any reversible error. Certiorari is denied.

So ordered.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., and HOLT, Associate Justice, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Here we are asked to review on certiorari the judgment of the Circuit Court of Dade County, affirming the judgment of the Civil Court of Record of Dade County in a replevin action. The petitioner failed to show that appellant in the trial court suffered any injury by reason of the alleged errors complained of and, therefore, has failed here to show any reversible error. Certiorari is denied.

So ordered.

TERRELL, Acting Chief Justice, BUFORD and ADAMS, JJ., and HOLT, Associate Justice, concur.

Hogan v. Burtner, 30 So. 2d 634, 159 Fla. 54, 1947 Fla. LEXIS 678 (Fla. 1947).

Pincite

30 So. 2d 634 (Hogan v. Burtner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.