Home/Idaho Supreme Court/Hogan v. Blakney

Hogan v. Blakney

251 P.2d 209, 73 Idaho 274, 1952 Ida. LEXIS 241
CourtIdaho Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 4, 1952
Docket7884
StatusPublished
Cited by40 cases

This text of 251 P.2d 209 (Hogan v. Blakney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Idaho Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hogan v. Blakney, 251 P.2d 209, 73 Idaho 274, 1952 Ida. LEXIS 241 (Idaho 1952).

Opinion

PORTER, Justice.

This case was commenced in the form of an action in ejectment, but was treated and tried by court and counsel as an action to quiet title. Both parties claim title to the land involved. The cause was tried to the court sitting without a jury *276 and resulted in a judgment quieting title to the land in respondent as against appellant. From such judgment, appellant has appealed to this court.

Block'One (1) of Miller’s Amended Addition to Smelterville, Idaho, is triangular in shape and was formerly owned by respondent. Appellant now owns the east 100 feet of the block and respondent owns the west 37.02 feet thereof. The land involved in this action is a small tract lying north of and contiguous to respondent’s land in Block 1 and is described in the complaint as follows:

“Beginning at the Northwest corner of Block One (1) of Miller’s Amended Addition to Smelterville, Idaho, according to the official and recorded plat thereof on record in the office of the County Recorder, Shoshone County, State of Idaho; running thence North 18° 18' West, 12.71 feet to a point; thence North 71° 42' East, 37.02 feet to a point; thence South 18° 18' East, 20.18 feet to a point; thence South 83° 20’ West, 37.82 feet to the place of beginning; subject to an easement in the Washington Water Power Company, a corporation, to erect, maintain and care for an electrical distribution line on and over said above described premises.”

The locale with which we are concerned in this action is shown by the plat of Miller’s Amended Addition to Smelter-ville, Idaho, being Plaintiff’s Exhibit No. 6, copy of which is inserted herein:.

*277

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kennedy v. Schneider
259 P.3d 586 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2011)
City of Kellogg v. Mission Mountain Interests Ltd., Co.
16 P.3d 915 (Idaho Supreme Court, 2000)
Nationsbanc Mortgage Corp. of New York v. Cazier
908 P.2d 572 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1995)
Bumgarner v. Bumgarner
862 P.2d 321 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1993)
Phillips Industries, Inc. v. Firkins
827 P.2d 706 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1992)
Cluff v. Bonner County
824 P.2d 115 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1992)
Currie v. Walkinshaw
746 P.2d 1045 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1987)
Wells v. Gootrad
736 P.2d 1366 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1987)
Idaho v. Hodel
814 F.2d 1288 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
State of Idaho v. Hodel
814 F.2d 1288 (Ninth Circuit, 1987)
Allen v. Boydstun
722 P.2d 497 (Idaho Court of Appeals, 1986)
Stucki v. Parker
703 P.2d 693 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1985)
Latham v. Garner
673 P.2d 1048 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1983)
Chournos v. D'AGNILLO
642 P.2d 710 (Utah Supreme Court, 1982)
Trappett v. Davis
633 P.2d 592 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1981)
Stecklein v. Montgomery
570 P.2d 1359 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1977)
Gameson v. Remer
537 P.2d 631 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1975)
Smith v. Smith
511 P.2d 294 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1973)
Mollendorf v. Derry
501 P.2d 199 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1972)
Creason v. Peterson
470 P.2d 403 (Utah Supreme Court, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
251 P.2d 209, 73 Idaho 274, 1952 Ida. LEXIS 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-blakney-idaho-1952.