Hogan v. ARDC Corp.
637 So. 2d 9, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4170, 1994 WL 163754
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 4, 1994
DocketNo. 93-0883
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases
This text of 637 So. 2d 9 (Hogan v. ARDC Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Hogan v. ARDC Corp., 637 So. 2d 9, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4170, 1994 WL 163754 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).
Opinion
ON MOTION FOB REHEARING
We deny appellant’s motion for rehearing, but amend our decision of March 9, 1994 to read as follows:
“PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED. Zell v. Cobb, 566 So.2d 806 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990), rev. denied, 577 So.2d 1331 (Fla.1991).”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
ARDC Corp. v. Hogan
656 So. 2d 1371 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Newsome v. Singletary
637 So. 2d 9 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1994)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
637 So. 2d 9, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 4170, 1994 WL 163754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hogan-v-ardc-corp-fladistctapp-1994.